Shelby County v. Holder

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
For more information, see the Wikipedia article "Shelby County v. Holder"

This is a topic, with start date May 18, 2012 and unknown end date.

Its theme(s) are United States domestic politics.

Summary of positions for this topic

Full listing

Click on position names to view quotes from each listed item.

Supreme Court should strike down section 5 of the Voting Rights Act

For
Against


All items that address this topic (7 total)

Title Author Source Date
The Voting Rights Act’s work isn’t finished The Washington Post editorial board The Washington Post February 26, 2013
Voting Rights Act isn't obsolete The Baltimore Sun editorial board The Baltimore Sun February 26, 2013
Voting rights showdown The Washington Times editorial board The Washington Times February 27, 2013
Voting rights are still vulnerable The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board The Philadelphia Inquirer February 28, 2013
Voting Rights Watershed The Wall Street Journal editorial board The Wall Street Journal February 28, 2013
In a rut on the voting rights act George F. Will New York Post March 3, 2013
Why we need the Voting Rights Act Eddie Bernice Johnson USA Today March 7, 2013