Squeezing Iraq: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|date=December 7, 2006 | |date=December 7, 2006 | ||
|url=http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0612070012dec07,0,5192037.story | |url=http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0612070012dec07,0,5192037.story | ||
|quote=" Broad, sustained consensus hasn't been this nation's strong suit of late. The Iraq Study Group offers a credible agenda that the White House, the Congress and the American people should embrace." | |quote="Broad, sustained consensus hasn't been this nation's strong suit of late. The Iraq Study Group offers a credible agenda that the White House, the Congress and the American people should embrace." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|Iraq Study Group's recommendations should be followed|for}} | {{opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|Iraq Study Group's recommendations should be followed|for}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:17, December 7, 2006
This is an opinion item.
| Author(s) | Chicago Tribune editorial board | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | Chicago Tribune | |||
| Date | December 7, 2006 | |||
| URL | http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0612070012dec07,0,5192037.story | |||
| Quote |
|
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Iraq Study Group's recommendations should be followed on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.