Standing in the Schoolhouse Door: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: {{item |author=Eugene Robinson |source=The Washington Post |date=June 29, 2007 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/28/AR2007062801789.html |quote="I start fro...)
 
(Global replace - 'Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District' to 'Parents v. Seattle')
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}


{{opinion|Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District|Supreme Court was correct in its ruling|against}}
{{opinion|Parents v. Seattle|Supreme Court was correct in its ruling|against}}

Revision as of 21:07, July 11, 2007

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Eugene Robinson
Source The Washington Post
Date June 29, 2007
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/28/AR2007062801789.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "I start from the premise that racial integration in the schools is a good thing. I think the educational process benefits from diversity, and all students are better served in an integrated classroom. I also believe that in a nation where minorities will someday form the majority, integration is an important civic lesson our schools ought to be teaching." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Parents v. Seattle.