Standing in the Schoolhouse Door: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Global replace - 'Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District' to 'Parents v. Seattle')
(Global replace - 'Parents v. Seattle' to 'Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District')
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}


{{opinion|Parents v. Seattle|Supreme Court was correct in its ruling|against}}
{{opinion|Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District|Supreme Court was correct in its ruling|against}}

Revision as of 22:56, July 11, 2007

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Eugene Robinson
Source The Washington Post
Date June 29, 2007
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/28/AR2007062801789.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "I start from the premise that racial integration in the schools is a good thing. I think the educational process benefits from diversity, and all students are better served in an integrated classroom. I also believe that in a nation where minorities will someday form the majority, integration is an important civic lesson our schools ought to be teaching." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District.