Syria’s al-Qaeda threat

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 11:11, September 8, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Washington Post editorial board, |source=The Washington Post |date=September 7, 2013 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/syrias-al-qaeda-threat/201...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Post editorial board
Source The Washington Post
Date September 7, 2013
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/syrias-al-qaeda-threat/2013/09/07/bd226aba-1709-11e3-804b-d3a1a3a18f2c_story.html
Quote
An attack that weakened regime forces could, of course, help the jihadists gain ground — but only if the United States and its allies failed to simultaneously bolster the mainstream Free Syrian Army. That’s why it is essential that Mr. Obama couple any strikes with a stepped up train-and-equip program for vetted rebel units. The way to counter the threat posed by the jihadists is not to leave the Assad regime in power, but to empower the moderate and secular majority.


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should intervene on the topic Syrian civil war.