Page values for "That pesky 1st Amendment: Liberals’ gripe with free speech"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
_creationDate   April 9, 2014 1:58:31 AM
_modificationDate   April 9, 2014 1:58:31 AM
_creator   Yaron Koren
_fullText   {{Item |author=Rich Lowry, |source=New York Post |date=April 4, 2014 |url=http://nypost.com/2014/04/04/that-pesky-1st-amendment-liberals-gripe-with-free-speech/ |quote=The critics of the decision object to it partly on egalitarian grounds: Very few donors have the resources to contribute enough to ...
_categories   Items
_numRevisions   1
_isRedirect   No
_pageNameOrRedirect   That pesky 1st Amendment: Liberals’ gripe with free speech

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
Author   Rich Lowry
Source   New York Post
Date   April 4, 2014
URL   http://nypost.com/2014/04/04/that-pesky-1st-amendment-liberals-gripe-with-free-speech/
Quote   The critics of the decision object to it partly on egalitarian grounds: Very few donors have the resources to contribute enough to bump up against the aggregate limits, so the decision gives disproportionate influence to a few people. A free political system always has such disparities. Should Thomas Paine have been silenced, since his incredible rhetorical powers made him more influential than other pamphleteers? Should The New York Times be shuttered, since it exercises more power than almost anyone else in New York?
Summary   

That pesky 1st Amendment: Liberals’ gripe with free speech by Rich Lowry (New York Post, April 4, 2014) (view)

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
Topic   McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
Position_fragment   Supreme Court voted correctly
Position   McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission / Supreme Court voted correctly
Position_link   

Supreme Court voted correctly

Stance   for