Page values for "The Constitution vs. Obamacare"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | March 28, 2012 11:59:54 AM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | March 28, 2012 11:59:54 AM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=National Review editorial board, |source=National Review |date=March 26, 2012 |url=http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/294370/constitution-vs-obamacare-editors |quote=The federal government has the power to regulate commerce among the states, but that power neither includes nor im ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | The Constitution vs. Obamacare |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 7,929 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 7,929 |
| _pageName | Page | The Constitution vs. Obamacare |
| _pageTitle | String | The Constitution vs. Obamacare |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act | |
| Position_fragment | String | Act is unconstitutional | |
| Position | Page | Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Act is unconstitutional | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | for |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | National Review editorial board |
| Source | Page | National Review |
| Date | Date | March 26, 2012 |
| URL | URL | http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/294370/constitution-vs-obamacare-editors |
| Quote | Text | The federal government has the power to regulate commerce among the states, but that power neither includes nor implies the authority to force individuals to purchase particular products. If it is read to include or imply that authority, then it must surely follow that the federal government may institute a compulsory calisthenic program for all Americans. The administration argues that an individual’s decision not to purchase health insurance has an effect, however minute, on health markets nationally, and that such decisions when aggregated have a large effect. But of course the same is true of individuals’ decisions to remain sedentary or eat too many sweets. |
| Summary | Wikitext | The Constitution vs. Obamacare by National Review editorial board (National Review, March 26, 2012) (view) |