The Enemy Detainee Mess

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 13:34, July 3, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=The Wall Street Journal editorial board |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=July 3, 2008 |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121504362668624767.html |quote="While GIs gat...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Wall Street Journal editorial board
Source The Wall Street Journal
Date July 3, 2008
URL http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121504362668624767.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "While GIs gathered shell casings or interviewed witnesses to meet a U.S. judge's habeas standard, they would leave themselves open to counterattack or sniper fire. No commander – and no Commander in Chief – can ask his troops to put themselves in danger to satisfy Justice Kennedy's legal afflatus. This is what Justice Antonin Scalia meant when he wrote that Americans will die as a result of Boumediene." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Boumediene v. Bush.