The Human Rights Case Against Attacking Iran

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 20:24, February 3, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Multiple values for author)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Shirin Ebadi, Hadi Ghaemi
Source The New York Times
Date February 8, 2005
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/08/opinion/08Ebadi.html?ex=1265605200&en=b7c50217775f6f6a&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Not only would a foreign invasion of Iran vitiate popular support for human rights activism, but by destroying civilian lives, institutions and infrastructure, war would also usher in chaos and instability. Respect for human rights is likely to be among the first casualties." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position United States should attack Iran on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.