The Jews Face a Double Standard: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: {{Item |author=Marvin Hier |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=January 8, 2009 |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123137495711862883.html |quote="And then there are the clarion calls f...)
 
m (Text replace - '2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict' to 'Gaza War')
 
Line 6: Line 6:
|quote="And then there are the clarion calls for a cease-fire. These words, which come so easily, have proven to be a recipe for disaster. Hamas uses the cease-fire as a time-out to rearm and smuggle even more deadly weapons so the next time, instead of hitting Sderot and Ashkelon, they can target Tel Aviv and Jerusalem."
|quote="And then there are the clarion calls for a cease-fire. These words, which come so easily, have proven to be a recipe for disaster. Hamas uses the cease-fire as a time-out to rearm and smuggle even more deadly weapons so the next time, instead of hitting Sderot and Ashkelon, they can target Tel Aviv and Jerusalem."
}}
}}
{{Opinion|2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict|Israel was right to attack Gaza|for}}
{{Opinion|Gaza War|Israel was right to attack Gaza|for}}

Latest revision as of 17:47, July 14, 2009

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Marvin Hier
Source The Wall Street Journal
Date January 8, 2009
URL http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123137495711862883.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "And then there are the clarion calls for a cease-fire. These words, which come so easily, have proven to be a recipe for disaster. Hamas uses the cease-fire as a time-out to rearm and smuggle even more deadly weapons so the next time, instead of hitting Sderot and Ashkelon, they can target Tel Aviv and Jerusalem." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Israel was right to attack Gaza on the topic Gaza War.