The Libya Intervention

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 14:22, March 29, 2011 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Nation editorial board, |source=The Nation |date=March 24, 2011 |url=http://www.thenation.com/article/159454/libya-intervention |quote=The likelihood of US...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Nation editorial board
Source The Nation
Date March 24, 2011
URL http://www.thenation.com/article/159454/libya-intervention
Quote
Quotes-start.png The likelihood of US or coalition forces killing civilians will only increase if Qaddafi’s troops solidify their hold on Tripoli and other cities; urban warfare is notoriously messy. The UN resolution forbids foreign occupation, so what will we do if Qaddafi hangs on and the conflict settles into a grinding civil war, with all its attendant chaos and bloodshed? Mission creep seems to be an inevitable feature of this kind of intervention. Quotes-end.png

The following other items refer to this item: Military action is costly, but not as much as apathy

Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position United States should impose a no-fly zone on the topic 2011 Libyan uprising.