The Mideast's Munich: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Better URL)
Line 3: Line 3:
|source=New York Post
|source=New York Post
|date=August 16, 2006
|date=August 16, 2006
|url=http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/the_mideasts_munich_opedcolumnists_arthur_herman.htm
|url=http://www.think-israel.org/herman.mideastmunich.html
|quote="Resolution 1701 shows that, for the time being at least, the balance has likewise shifted to the terrorists and their state sponsors. Like Munich, it marks the triumph of the principle of putting off until tomorrow what needs to be done today. Like Munich, it will mean not peace in our time, but a bigger war in our future."
|quote="Resolution 1701 shows that, for the time being at least, the balance has likewise shifted to the terrorists and their state sponsors. Like Munich, it marks the triumph of the principle of putting off until tomorrow what needs to be done today. Like Munich, it will mean not peace in our time, but a bigger war in our future."
}}
}}

Revision as of 23:30, June 13, 2007

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Arthur Herman
Source New York Post
Date August 16, 2006
URL http://www.think-israel.org/herman.mideastmunich.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Resolution 1701 shows that, for the time being at least, the balance has likewise shifted to the terrorists and their state sponsors. Like Munich, it marks the triumph of the principle of putting off until tomorrow what needs to be done today. Like Munich, it will mean not peace in our time, but a bigger war in our future." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Israel was right to agree to a cease-fire on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.


This item argues for the position United States should attack Iran on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.