The Mideast's Munich: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Even better URL) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|source=New York Post | |source=New York Post | ||
|date=August 16, 2006 | |date=August 16, 2006 | ||
|url=http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/the_mideasts_munich_opedcolumnists_arthur_herman.htm | |url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/08162006/postopinion/opedcolumnists/the_mideasts_munich_opedcolumnists_arthur_herman.htm | ||
|quote="Resolution 1701 shows that, for the time being at least, the balance has likewise shifted to the terrorists and their state sponsors. Like Munich, it marks the triumph of the principle of putting off until tomorrow what needs to be done today. Like Munich, it will mean not peace in our time, but a bigger war in our future." | |quote="Resolution 1701 shows that, for the time being at least, the balance has likewise shifted to the terrorists and their state sponsors. Like Munich, it marks the triumph of the principle of putting off until tomorrow what needs to be done today. Like Munich, it will mean not peace in our time, but a bigger war in our future." | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 23:36, June 13, 2007
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Arthur Herman |
---|---|
Source | New York Post |
Date | August 16, 2006 |
URL | http://www.nypost.com/seven/08162006/postopinion/opedcolumnists/the_mideasts_munich_opedcolumnists_arthur_herman.htm |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Israel was right to agree to a cease-fire on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.
This item argues for the position United States should attack Iran on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.