https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=The_Republican_case_for_ratifying_New_START&feed=atom&action=historyThe Republican case for ratifying New START - Revision history2024-03-29T15:17:53ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.39.2https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=The_Republican_case_for_ratifying_New_START&diff=13539&oldid=prevYaron Koren: Created page with "{{Item |author=Henry Kissinger, George Shultz, James Baker, Lawrence Eagleburger, Colin Powell |source=The Washington Post |date=December 2, 2010 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.c..."2010-12-02T15:00:46Z<p>Created page with "{{Item |author=Henry Kissinger, George Shultz, James Baker, Lawrence Eagleburger, Colin Powell |source=The Washington Post |date=December 2, 2010 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.c..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Item<br />
|author=Henry Kissinger, George Shultz, James Baker, Lawrence Eagleburger, Colin Powell<br />
|source=The Washington Post<br />
|date=December 2, 2010<br />
|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/01/AR2010120104598.html<br />
|quote="First, the agreement emphasizes verification, providing a valuable window into Russia's nuclear arsenal. Since the original START expired last December, Russia has not been required to provide notifications about changes in its strategic nuclear arsenal, and the United States has been unable to conduct on-site inspections. Each day, America's understanding of Russia's arsenal has been degraded, and resources have been diverted from national security tasks to try to fill the gaps."<br />
}}<br />
{{Opinion|New START|Treaty should be ratified|for}}</div>Yaron Koren