The Stimulus Advances

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 15:51, January 29, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=January 28, 2009 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/opinion/29thu1.html |quote="Contrary to the claim...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The New York Times editorial board
Source The New York Times
Date January 28, 2009
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/opinion/29thu1.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Contrary to the claims of Republican opponents that the bill indiscriminately rains money down, the amounts and categories of spending have, for the most part, been calculated carefully and chosen well. Nearly 30 percent is devoted to unemployment benefits, food stamps and fiscal aid to states so that they don’t have to cut services, raise taxes and lay off employees and contractors. Evidence is overwhelming that such spending yields the biggest return for every dollar spent." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.