Page values for "The Voting Rights Act’s work isn’t finished"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
_creationDate | Datetime | March 5, 2013 3:53:51 PM |
_modificationDate | Datetime | March 5, 2013 4:04:05 PM |
_creator | String | Yaron Koren |
_fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=The Washington Post editorial board, |source=The Washington Post |date=February 26, 2013 |url=http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-02-26/opinions/37307799_1_voting-rights-act-clearance-jurisdictions |quote=The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund argues that voting dilution ... |
_categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
_numRevisions | Integer | 3 |
_isRedirect | Boolean | No |
_pageNameOrRedirect | String | The Voting Rights Act’s work isn’t finished |
_pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 8,410 |
_lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
_pageID | Integer | 8,410 |
_pageName | Page | The Voting Rights Act’s work isn’t finished |
_pageTitle | String | The Voting Rights Act’s work isn’t finished |
_pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
---|---|---|---|
Topic | Page | Shelby County v. Holder | |
Position_fragment | String | Supreme Court should strike down section 5 of the Voting Rights Act | |
Position | Page | Shelby County v. Holder / Supreme Court should strike down section 5 of the Voting Rights Act | |
Position_link | Wikitext | Supreme Court should strike down section 5 of the Voting Rights Act | |
Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | The Washington Post editorial board |
Source | Page | The Washington Post |
Date | Date | February 26, 2013 |
URL | URL | http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-02-26/opinions/37307799_1_voting-rights-act-clearance-jurisdictions |
Quote | Text | The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund argues that voting dilution — for example, when officials slice and dice minority populations into myriad districts to limit their electoral influence — is “an old poison in new bottles.” Even if the Justice Department is objecting less, protecting the right to vote is of such importance that Congress should have the authority to use strong measures to protect it. |
Summary | Wikitext | The Voting Rights Act’s work isn’t finished by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, February 26, 2013) (view) |