The dubious 'civil war' option

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 16:27, July 16, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Global replace - 'http://washingtontimes.com' to 'http://www3.washingtontimes.com')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Times editorial board
Source The Washington Times
Date February 2, 2007
URL http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20070201-084310-5912r.htm
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Messrs. Pollack and Byman contend that the most serious, damaging consequences of civil war will be the "spillover" into neighboring countries. A partial listing of the problems include the creation of new terrorist groups (Hezbollah, for example, was created as a result of the Lebanon civil war), radicalization of native populations; the formation of secessionist movements; and heightened potential for new violence as Iraq's neighbors are drawn in." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Coalition troops should pull out on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.