The farm lobby vs. the global warming bill

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 18:00, July 9, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=Los Angeles Times editorial board |source=Los Angeles Times |date=June 26, 2009 |url=http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-climate26-2009jun26,0,5647633.story ')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Los Angeles Times editorial board
Source Los Angeles Times
Date June 26, 2009
URL http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-climate26-2009jun26,0,5647633.story
Quote
Quotes-start.png "If the bill is far from perfect, that doesn't mean it isn't good. It's the first significant attempt by the United States to join other responsible nations that are trying to wean themselves off fossil fuels and build a better future for their children. Its provisions are weak and will be almost unnoticeable at first, but they will strengthen over time, and the framework it creates can be improved on later if it's not producing the intended cuts." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic American Clean Energy and Security Act.