Page values for "The real danger behind the ‘McCutcheon’ ruling"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | April 6, 2014 5:38:21 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | April 6, 2014 5:38:21 PM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=Ruth Marcus, |source=The Washington Post |date=April 4, 2014 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ruth-marcus-the-real-danger-behind-the-mccutcheon-ruling/2014/04/04/022ddcd4-bc32-11e3-9a05-c739f29ccb08_story.html |quote=In McCutcheon, ''Roberts'' oversaw the metastasis of Ken ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | The real danger behind the ‘McCutcheon’ ruling |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 8,936 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 8,936 |
| _pageName | Page | The real danger behind the ‘McCutcheon’ ruling |
| _pageTitle | String | The real danger behind the ‘McCutcheon’ ruling |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission | |
| Position_fragment | String | Supreme Court voted correctly | |
| Position | Page | McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission / Supreme Court voted correctly | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | Ruth Marcus |
| Source | Page | The Washington Post |
| Date | Date | April 4, 2014 |
| URL | URL | http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ruth-marcus-the-real-danger-behind-the-mccutcheon-ruling/2014/04/04/022ddcd4-bc32-11e3-9a05-c739f29ccb08_story.html |
| Quote | Text | In McCutcheon, ''Roberts'' oversaw the metastasis of Kennedy’s unrealistic test from expenditures to contributions. A politician receiving one humongous check, with proceeds to be distributed among candidates and party committees, will naturally be “grateful” to the donor but will not feel “obligated” in a way that constitutes corruption, he asserted, happily substituting his judgment about what is corrupting for that of members of Congress who might actually know. |
| Summary | Wikitext | The real danger behind the ‘McCutcheon’ ruling by Ruth Marcus (The Washington Post, April 4, 2014) (view) |