Page values for "The solution to money in politics"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeApril 6, 2014 5:33:55 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeApril 6, 2014 5:33:55 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=Michael Kinsley, |source=The Washington Post |date=April 4, 2014 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/michael-kinsley-the-solution-to-money-in-politics/2014/04/04/5ac0b412-bb8c-11e3-96ae-f2c36d2b1245_story.html |quote=The rules are made for the rule-abiding, and a rule-abiding ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringThe solution to money in politics
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger8,935
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger8,935
_pageNamePageThe solution to money in politics
_pageTitleString

The solution to money in politics

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,Michael Kinsley
SourcePageThe Washington Post
DateDateApril 4, 2014
URLURLhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/michael-kinsley-the-solution-to-money-in-politics/2014/04/04/5ac0b412-bb8c-11e3-96ae-f2c36d2b1245_story.html
QuoteTextThe rules are made for the rule-abiding, and a rule-abiding politician can use money from campaign contributions only in efforts to persuade the voters. In other words, not only is campaign spending speech — it is ''only'' speech. That’s all the money is good for. And the voters have it within their power to ignore this speech and make all that contribution money worthless.
SummaryWikitext

The solution to money in politics by Michael Kinsley (The Washington Post, April 4, 2014) (view)

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageMcCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
Position_fragmentStringSupreme Court voted correctly
PositionPageMcCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission / Supreme Court voted correctly
Position_linkWikitext

Supreme Court voted correctly

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstfor