Too Little Bang for The Bucks

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 14:12, February 2, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=Robert J. Samuelson |source=The Washington Post |date=February 2, 2009 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/01/AR2009020101001.html |quote="The ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Robert J. Samuelson
Source The Washington Post
Date February 2, 2009
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/01/AR2009020101001.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "The central purpose is simple: halt downward momentum. Perhaps some of the out-year spending might ultimately prove useful. But the immediate need is for the stimulus package to stimulate -- now. It needs to be front-loaded; it isn't." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.