Travesty in New York

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 22:23, November 23, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=Charles Krauthammer |source=The Washington Post |date=November 20, 2009 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/19/AR2009111903434.html |...')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Charles Krauthammer
Source The Washington Post
Date November 20, 2009
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/19/AR2009111903434.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "What happens if KSM (and his co-defendants) "do not get convicted," asked Senate Judiciary Committee member Herb Kohl. "Failure is not an option," replied Holder. Not an option? Doesn't the presumption of innocence, er, presume that prosecutorial failure -- acquittal, hung jury -- is an option? By undermining that presumption, Holder is undermining the fairness of the trial, the demonstration of which is the alleged rationale for putting on this show in the first place." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Trial should be held in criminal court on the topic United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al..