Unchecked power: The courts and Obamacare

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 21:24, December 17, 2010 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=New Hampshire Union Leader editorial board |source=New Hampshire Union Leader |date=December 15, 2010 |url=http://unionleader.com/article.aspx?articleId=5795c3f9-3...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) New Hampshire Union Leader editorial board
Source New Hampshire Union Leader
Date December 15, 2010
URL http://unionleader.com/article.aspx?articleId=5795c3f9-308b-4e17-973b-35762b8ca522
Quotes-start.png "After more appeals, the battle over Obamacare's constitutionality will reach the Supreme Court. The justices will doubtless read Judge Hudson's ruling and its clear summary sentence: "At its core, this dispute is not simply about regulating the business of insurance -- or crafting a scheme of universal health coverage -- it's about an individual's right to choose to participate."" Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.