Page values for "Vote ‘no’ on Kavanaugh"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
_creationDate | Datetime | December 28, 2018 5:48:37 PM |
_modificationDate | Datetime | December 28, 2018 5:48:37 PM |
_creator | String | Yaron Koren |
_fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=The Washington Post editorial board |source=The Washington Post |date=October 4, 2018 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-no-on-kavanaugh/2018/10/04/23495e3a-c7f3-11e8-b1ed-1d2d65b86d0c_story.html?utm_term=.3ada337e22ad |quote=If Mr. Kavanaugh truly is, or believes himse ... |
_categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
_numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
_isRedirect | Boolean | No |
_pageNameOrRedirect | String | Vote ‘no’ on Kavanaugh |
_pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 13,677 |
_lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
_pageID | Integer | 13,677 |
_pageName | Page | Vote ‘no’ on Kavanaugh |
_pageTitle | String | Vote ‘no’ on Kavanaugh |
_pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
---|---|---|---|
Topic | Page | Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination | |
Position_fragment | String | Kavanaugh should be confirmed | |
Position | Page | Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination / Kavanaugh should be confirmed | |
Position_link | Wikitext | ||
Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | The Washington Post editorial board |
Source | Page | The Washington Post |
Date | Date | October 4, 2018 |
URL | URL | https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-no-on-kavanaugh/2018/10/04/23495e3a-c7f3-11e8-b1ed-1d2d65b86d0c_story.html?utm_term=.3ada337e22ad |
Quote | Text | If Mr. Kavanaugh truly is, or believes himself to be, a victim of mistaken identity, his anger is understandable. But he went further in last Thursday’s hearing than expressing anger. He gratuitously indulged in hyperpartisan rhetoric against “the left,” describing his stormy confirmation as “a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election” and “revenge on behalf of the Clintons.” He provided neither evidence nor even a plausible explanation for this red-meat partisanship, but he poisoned any sense that he could serve as an impartial judge. |
Summary | Wikitext | Vote ‘no’ on Kavanaugh by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, October 4, 2018) (view) |