Page values for "Vote ‘no’ on Kavanaugh"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeDecember 28, 2018 5:48:37 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeDecember 28, 2018 5:48:37 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=The Washington Post editorial board |source=The Washington Post |date=October 4, 2018 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-no-on-kavanaugh/2018/10/04/23495e3a-c7f3-11e8-b1ed-1d2d65b86d0c_story.html?utm_term=.3ada337e22ad |quote=If Mr. Kavanaugh truly is, or believes himse ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringVote ‘no’ on Kavanaugh
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger13,677
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger13,677
_pageNamePageVote ‘no’ on Kavanaugh
_pageTitleString

Vote ‘no’ on Kavanaugh

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageBrett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination
Position_fragmentStringKavanaugh should be confirmed
PositionPageBrett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination / Kavanaugh should be confirmed
Position_linkWikitext

Kavanaugh should be confirmed

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,The Washington Post editorial board
SourcePageThe Washington Post
DateDateOctober 4, 2018
URLURLhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-no-on-kavanaugh/2018/10/04/23495e3a-c7f3-11e8-b1ed-1d2d65b86d0c_story.html?utm_term=.3ada337e22ad
QuoteTextIf Mr. Kavanaugh truly is, or believes himself to be, a victim of mistaken identity, his anger is understandable. But he went further in last Thursday’s hearing than expressing anger. He gratuitously indulged in hyperpartisan rhetoric against “the left,” describing his stormy confirmation as “a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election” and “revenge on behalf of the Clintons.” He provided neither evidence nor even a plausible explanation for this red-meat partisanship, but he poisoned any sense that he could serve as an impartial judge.
SummaryWikitext

Vote ‘no’ on Kavanaugh by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, October 4, 2018) (view)