Voting rights are still vulnerable

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 16:13, March 5, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board, |source=The Philadelphia Inquirer |date=February 28, 2013 |url=")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board
Source The Philadelphia Inquirer
Date February 28, 2013
Quotes-start.png The 2012 election also provided ample evidence that such protections are still needed. The Voting Rights Act played a role in successful efforts to prevent several states, including Pennsylvania, from implementing voter-identification laws that were expected to discourage minorities from showing up at the polls. And despite those efforts, there were still cases like that of the 102-year-old Florida woman who had to wait more than three hours to cast her ballot. Her state curtailed early voting, causing long lines at polling places. Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Supreme Court should strike down section 5 of the Voting Rights Act on the topic Shelby County v. Holder.