We were Brett Kavanaugh’s drinking buddies. We don’t think he should be confirmed.

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 23:09, December 28, 2018 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Charles Ludington, Lynne Brookes, Elizabeth Swisher |source=The Washington Post |date=October 4, 2018 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/we-were-brett...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Charles Ludington, Lynne Brookes, Elizabeth Swisher
Source The Washington Post
Date October 4, 2018
URL https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/we-were-brett-kavanaughs-drinking-buddies-we-dont-think-he-should-be-confirmed/2018/10/04/923cf6ac-c821-11e8-b2b5-79270f9cce17_story.html?utm_term=.f17ca600f335
Quotes-start.png We each asserted that Brett lied to the Senate by stating, under oath, that he never drank to the point of forgetting what he was doing. We said, unequivocally, that each of us, on numerous occasions, had seen Brett stumbling drunk to the point that it would be impossible for him to state with any degree of certainty that he remembered everything that he did when drunk. Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Kavanaugh should be confirmed on the topic Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination.