Weed It and Reap

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 15:11, December 20, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=Michael Pollan |source=The New York Times |date=November 4, 2007 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/04/opinion/04pollan.html |quote="When you consider that farm income is a...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Michael Pollan
Source The New York Times
Date November 4, 2007
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/04/opinion/04pollan.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "When you consider that farm income is at record levels (thanks to the ethanol boom, itself fueled by another set of federal subsidies); that the World Trade Organization has ruled that several of these subsidies are illegal; that the federal government is broke and the president is threatening a veto, bringing forth a $288 billion farm bill that guarantees billions in payments to commodity farmers seems impressively defiant." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Bill should be passed on the topic 2007 U.S. Farm Bill.