Page values for "What Was the Supreme Court Thinking?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | September 18, 2006 5:33:30 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | September 18, 2006 5:33:47 PM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{item |author=Mark Davis |source=The Dallas Morning News |date=July 3, 2006 |url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/07/hamdan_not_your_ordinary_botch.html |quote="As for the Geneva Conventions, Justice John Paul Stevens in his opinion for the majority seems stunningly unaware of wh ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 2 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | What Was the Supreme Court Thinking? |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 1,968 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 1,968 |
| _pageName | Page | What Was the Supreme Court Thinking? |
| _pageTitle | String | What Was the Supreme Court Thinking? |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | |
| Position_fragment | String | Supreme Court was correct in its ruling | |
| Position | Page | Hamdan v. Rumsfeld / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | Mark Davis |
| Source | Page | The Dallas Morning News |
| Date | Date | July 3, 2006 |
| URL | URL | http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/07/hamdan_not_your_ordinary_botch.html |
| Quote | Text | "As for the Geneva Conventions, Justice John Paul Stevens in his opinion for the majority seems stunningly unaware of when they apply and when they do not. They apply when we are at war with a uniformed enemy belonging to another country that is a signatory to and practitioner of the Conventions' protections. Not one of those conditions applies in the war on terror." |
| Summary | Wikitext | What Was the Supreme Court Thinking? by Mark Davis (The Dallas Morning News, July 3, 2006) (view) |