Why the individual mandate holds the key to health-care reform

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 11:28, March 28, 2012 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Washington Post editorial board, |source=The Washington Post |date=March 26, 2012 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-the-individual-mandate-ma...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Post editorial board
Source The Washington Post
Date March 26, 2012
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-the-individual-mandate-matters-so-much/2012/03/23/gIQA8zCacS_story.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png Yet [the Supreme Court] has upheld Congress’s Commerce Clause power to reach individuals who were not obviously involved in commercial activity — most famously, the Depression-era farmer who grew wheat for his own consumption. The court concluded that his decision to grow — rather than purchase — wheat interfered with the government’s ability to regulate wheat prices. The same logic should hold true for individuals able but unwilling to buy health insurance: Their absence has a significant impact on the market, especially because it is virtually inevitable that they will need health-care services at some point in their lives. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act is unconstitutional on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.