Food for thought

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board
Source The Philadelphia Inquirer
Date August 18, 2007
Quotes-start.png "The House did sweeten the pot for conservation, renewable energy, nutrition and specialty crops - all good steps, which confronted reform-minded lobbyists with a tough choice. Should they settle for these modest gains, or keep pushing for systemic change against long odds? They should keep pushing. The Senate can and must do better than a $286 billion bill that "promotes protectionism, overproduction and market interference," as Taxpayers for Commonsense says." Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Bill should be passed on the topic 2007 U.S. Farm Bill.