For safety's sake, approve Keystone

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Star Tribune editorial board
Source Star Tribune
Date January 23, 2015
Quotes-start.png While pipelines are not without risk, they are widely considered the least risky option among the methods current used — trains, trucks and tankers — to move large volumes of crude. Because building Keystone would funnel more crude from Western Canada and North Dakota into pipelines and help reduce the amount traveling in Minnesota and elsewhere by train and other modes, Keystone XL should be approved. Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues for the position Pipeline should be built on the topic Keystone XL pipeline.