Ruling reflects America's ambivalence on guns

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) USA Today editorial board
Source USA Today
Date June 27, 2008
Quotes-start.png "Fortunately, the 5-4 decision to strike down the District of Columbia's tough ban on handgun possession didn't go as far as gun-control advocates had feared or the gun lobby had hoped. The justices agreed that a right to individual ownership doesn't mean that anyone can own any weapon. That leaves in place reasonable restrictions or outright bans on firearms such as machine guns and sawed-off shotguns, and exotic weapons such as surface-to-air missiles." Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues for the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic District of Columbia v. Heller.