A Bumper-Sticker Menace: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by 189.217.139.184 (talk) to last revision by Yaron Koren) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{item | ||
|author=Ryan Sager | |author=Ryan Sager | ||
|source=New York Post | |source=New York Post | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote="It seems that, so long as trouble-makers are ready to write up the complaints, the FEC is happy to take any nutball theory for a few spins around the track - no matter how ludicrous the repercussions for free speech in our democracy." | |quote="It seems that, so long as trouble-makers are ready to write up the complaints, the FEC is happy to take any nutball theory for a few spins around the track - no matter how ludicrous the repercussions for free speech in our democracy." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | |||
{{opinion|Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act|Act should be repealed|for}} |
Latest revision as of 06:56, November 17, 2014
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Ryan Sager |
---|---|
Source | New York Post |
Date | January 3, 2007 |
URL | http://www.nypost.com/seven/01032007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/a_bumper_sticker_menace__opedcolumnists_ryan_sager.htm?page=0 |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act should be repealed on the topic Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.