A Bumper-Sticker Menace: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (Reverted edits by 189.217.139.184 (talk) to last revision by Yaron Koren)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Item
{{item
|author=Ryan Sager
|author=Ryan Sager
|source=New York Post
|source=New York Post
Line 6: Line 6:
|quote="It seems that, so long as trouble-makers are ready to write up the complaints, the FEC is happy to take any nutball theory for a few spins around the track - no matter how ludicrous the repercussions for free speech in our democracy."
|quote="It seems that, so long as trouble-makers are ready to write up the complaints, the FEC is happy to take any nutball theory for a few spins around the track - no matter how ludicrous the repercussions for free speech in our democracy."
}}
}}
{{Opinion|Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act|Act should be repealed|for}}
 
{{Reference|Crystian}}
{{opinion|Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act|Act should be repealed|for}}

Latest revision as of 06:56, November 17, 2014

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Ryan Sager
Source New York Post
Date January 3, 2007
URL http://www.nypost.com/seven/01032007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/a_bumper_sticker_menace__opedcolumnists_ryan_sager.htm?page=0
Quote
Quotes-start.png "It seems that, so long as trouble-makers are ready to write up the complaints, the FEC is happy to take any nutball theory for a few spins around the track - no matter how ludicrous the repercussions for free speech in our democracy." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act should be repealed on the topic Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.