Picture IDs are perfectly sensible: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion|Federal Election Integrity Act|Act should be passed|for}} | {{Opinion|Federal Election Integrity Act|Act should be passed|for}} | ||
{{Opinion|2006 Dismissal of U.S. Attorneys controversy|Alberto Gonzales should be impeached|against}} | |||
{{Reference|Keep Away the Vote}} | {{Reference|Keep Away the Vote}} | ||
{{Reference|'Buy American' provisions offer recipe for retaliation}} | {{Reference|'Buy American' provisions offer recipe for retaliation}} | ||
{{Reference|5B, keep the change}} | {{Reference|5B, keep the change}} | ||
test111 | test111 |
Revision as of 18:35, August 15, 2013
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Charleston Daily Mail editorial board |
---|---|
Source | Charleston Daily Mail |
Date | September 28, 2006 |
URL | http://www.dailymail.com/news/Opinion/200609283/ |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Federal Election Integrity Act.
This item argues against the position 2006 Dismissal of U.S. Attorneys controversy / Alberto Gonzales should be impeached on the topic 2006 Dismissal of U.S. Attorneys controversy.
This item refers to the previous opinion item Keep Away the Vote.
This item refers to the previous opinion item 'Buy American' provisions offer recipe for retaliation.
This item refers to the previous opinion item 5B, keep the change. test111