Page values for "A Case for Appeal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | September 26, 2006 2:48:18 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | September 26, 2006 2:48:18 PM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{item |author=The Washington Post editorial board |source=The Washington Post |date=September 26, 2006 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/25/AR2006092501300.html |quote="The compromise bill strips the courts of any jurisdiction to hear cases -- including those ca ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | A Case for Appeal |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 2,071 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 2,071 |
| _pageName | Page | A Case for Appeal |
| _pageTitle | String | A Case for Appeal |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | Military Commissions Act of 2006 | |
| Position_fragment | String | Compromise bill should be passed | |
| Position | Page | Military Commissions Act of 2006 / Compromise bill should be passed | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | The Washington Post editorial board |
| Source | Page | The Washington Post |
| Date | Date | September 26, 2006 |
| URL | URL | http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/25/AR2006092501300.html |
| Quote | Text | "The compromise bill strips the courts of any jurisdiction to hear cases -- including those cases already pending -- concerning detainee treatment. Unless this provision is changed, the administration will be free to ignore Mr. McCain's interpretation." |
| Summary | Wikitext | A Case for Appeal by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, September 26, 2006) (view) |