Ruling for the Law

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 12:46, August 18, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Approved revision (diff) | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Revision as of 17:05, August 28, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) ("e)

(diff) ← Older revision | Approved revision (diff) | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) New York Times Editorial Staff
Source New York Times
Date 8/18/2006
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/18/opinion/18fri1.html
Quote
"But for now, with a careful, thoroughly grounded opinion, one judge in Michigan has done what 535 members of Congress have so abysmally failed to do. She has reasserted the rule of law over a lawless administration and shown why issues of this kind belong within the constitutional process created more than two centuries ago to handle them."


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Program should be ruled unconstitutional on the topic NSA warrantless surveillance controversy.