Ruling for the Law

From Discourse DB
This is the approved revision of this page, as well as being the most recent.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The New York Times editorial board
Source The New York Times
Date 8/18/2006
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/18/opinion/18fri1.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "But for now, with a careful, thoroughly grounded opinion, one judge in Michigan has done what 535 members of Congress have so abysmally failed to do. She has reasserted the rule of law over a lawless administration and shown why issues of this kind belong within the constitutional process created more than two centuries ago to handle them." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional on the topic NSA warrantless surveillance controversy.