The Big 3-2-1

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 15:28, December 7, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board |source=The Philadelphia Inquirer |date=December 7, 2008 |url=http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20081207_Editorial__Auto_Bailo...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board
Source The Philadelphia Inquirer
Date December 7, 2008
URL http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20081207_Editorial__Auto_Bailout.html
Quote
"Perhaps the biggest shortcoming in these announced restructurings is that there are no plans to replace current management. The executive teams at Ford and Chrysler are fairly new, but GM has been run by the same executives and board for years. GM chief G. Richard Wagoner made $24 million last year. Why should taxpayers provide loans to reward the same management that allowed GM to drift into chaos? Congress should insist on new management as a condition of a cash infusion."


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item takes a mixed stance on the position United States should bail out the automobile industry on the topic Economic crisis of 2008.

Retrieved from "https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=The_Big_3-2-1&oldid=8481"