Picture IDs are perfectly sensible: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Undo revision 15436 by 216.252.207.22 (talk))
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


{{Reference|This a test item to see where it goes if it is the first one.}}
{{Reference|This a test item to see where it goes if it is the first one.}}
 
{{Reference|I wish I could understand this construct}}


this is ron doin g atest
this is ron doin g atest

Revision as of 08:09, May 26, 2012

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Charleston Daily Mail editorial board
Source Bangkok Post
Date September 28, 2006
URL http://www.dailymail.com/news/Opinion/200609283/
Quote
Quotes-start.png "While Ireland undoubtedly has worked hard to purge dead people from the voter registration rolls, people still manage to cast ballots in the names of the dead. Requiring a photo ID would nip that in the bud. Another Democratic talking point is that some of the poor, the elderly and the disabled do not have photo IDs. But the state already issues photo IDs to non-drivers at the Division of Motor Vehicles." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Federal Election Integrity Act.


This item argues against the position Israel should attack Syria on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.


This item argues for the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Parents v. Seattle.


This item addresses the topic JOTest.


This item refers to the previous opinion item This a test item to see where it goes if it is the first one..

This item refers to the previous opinion item I wish I could understand this construct.

this is ron doin g atest