Picture IDs are perfectly sensible: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Undo revision 15436 by 216.252.207.22 (talk)) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
{{Opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Israel should attack Syria|against}} | {{Opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Israel should attack Syria|against}} | ||
{{Opinion|Parents v. Seattle|Supreme Court was correct in its ruling|for}} | {{Opinion|Parents v. Seattle|Supreme Court was correct in its ruling|for}} | ||
{{Opinion|JOTest|testing the editing}} | |||
{{Reference|This a test item to see where it goes if it is the first one.}} | {{Reference|This a test item to see where it goes if it is the first one.}} | ||
this is ron doin g atest | this is ron doin g atest |
Revision as of 18:12, May 17, 2012
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Charleston Daily Mail editorial board |
---|---|
Source | Bangkok Post |
Date | September 28, 2006 |
URL | http://www.dailymail.com/news/Opinion/200609283/ |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Federal Election Integrity Act.
This item argues against the position Israel should attack Syria on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.
This item argues for the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Parents v. Seattle.
This item addresses the topic JOTest.
This item refers to the previous opinion item This a test item to see where it goes if it is the first one..
this is ron doin g atest