A defeat for Bolton could undercut US policy

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Thomas M. Boyd
Source The Boston Globe
Date August 1, 2006
URL http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/08/01/a_defeat_for_bolton_could_undercut_us_policy/
Quote
"Indeed, most of the criticism aimed at Bolton has nothing to do with him. More than anything else, it represents an effort to set the political stage for the upcoming midterm congressional elections in November."


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Bolton should be confirmed on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.


This item argues against the position Confirmation should be filibustered on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.


This item refers to the previous opinion item Why I'll Vote for Bolton.

This item refers to the previous opinion item A public advocate for the United States.

Retrieved from "https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=A_defeat_for_Bolton_could_undercut_US_policy&oldid=8388"