This is an opinion item.
| Author(s)
|
David B. Rivkin Jr., Lee Casey
|
| Source
|
The Wall Street Journal
|
| Date
|
November 15, 2011
|
| URL
|
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204323904577038232724779286.html
|
| Quote
|
|
If Congress can require individuals to buy or otherwise obtain and maintain health insurance simply because they may be said to impact commerce by their very existence, without regard to any particular activity in which they have chosen to engage, then there is no limit on federal power. For example, if Congress can require you to buy health insurance because your lack of insurance may, at some point in the future, impose costs on the wider economy, then on the same theory it can require the purchase (or sale) of virtually any good or service, since the failure to have or use the relevant product can always be said to have some economic impact.
|
|
|
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
