Syrian chemical attack demands precise strike

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) USA Today editorial board
Source USA Today
Date August 27, 2013
URL http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/08/26/syria-chemical-attack-obama-red-line-editorials-debates/2704003/
Quote
Quotes-start.png If and when an attack comes, it must be forceful enough to convince Assad that use of chemical weapons will weaken him, not help him. And it must be justified explicitly as retaliation for violation of international treaties on use of chemical weapons — not as an attempt to dictate the outcome of the civil war. A missile attack appears the likeliest and smartest option. It could be used to weaken Syria's air power, to destroy units that used the chemical weapons, to strike the weapons themselves, or to attack other targets. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should intervene on the topic Syrian civil war.


This item argues against the position United States should depose Bashar Assad on the topic Syrian civil war.