“Civil War” Doesn't Mean It’s Over
From Discourse DB
This is an opinion item.
| Author(s) | Jonah Goldberg |
|---|---|
| Source | National Review |
| Date | May 18, 2007 |
| URL | http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjhmODg1MWEwYjNiNzhlMmRkYzI1OWNkMzFmYmQzMDk= |
| Quote | "Surely it can’t be a moral argument. Every liberal foreign policy do-gooder in Christendom wants America to interject itself in the Sudanese civil war unfolding so horrifically in Darfur. The high-water mark in post-Vietnam liberal foreign policy was Bill Clinton’s intervention in the Yugoslavian civil war. If we can violate the prime directive of no civil wars for Darfur and Kosovo, why not for Kirkuk and Basra?"
|
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Coalition troops should pull out on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.
